• About Air & Space
  • Email Updates
  • Member Services
  • Shop
  • Archive
airspacemag.com
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • goSmithsonian
  • Smithsonian magazine
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Photos & Videos
  • Subscribe

(Artist: Don Davis)
  • Space Exploration

The Last Days of T.rex

Maybe an asteroid wasn't to blame after all.

  • By Bob Craddock
  • airspacemag.com, January 16, 2007

Article Tools

 
  • Font
  • Share/Save/Bookmark Share
     
  • Email
  •  
  • Print
  • Digg Digg
     
  • Comments
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
     
  • RSS
  • Reddit Reddit
     

    Martian Gushers

    Bob Craddock

    Claims of active flows on Mars are remarkable, but do they hold water?

    MGS, R.I.P.

    Bob Craddock

    A round of applause for one of the most productive planetary missions ever.

    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    1. Welcome to Cyberairspace
    2. B-36: Bomber at the Crossroads
    3. Fear of Floating
    4. Live and Let Fly
    5. The Notorious Flight of Mathias Rust
    6. The Dawn of Discipline
    7. Voices from the Moon
    8. Can We Stop a Nuke?
    9. Red, White, and Blue
    10. Above and Beyond: My Enemy, My Friend
    1. Above and Beyond: My Enemy, My Friend
    2. Apollo’s Army
    3. Aviation's Jackie Robinson
    4. B-36: Bomber at the Crossroads
    5. Above & Beyond: Shooting Up a Shooting Star
    6. Torture Chamber
    7. A&S Interview: Captain Eric Brown
    8. Made in the U.S.S.R.
    9. Can We Stop a Nuke?
    10. Fear of Floating

    Few scientific theories have been accepted as quickly as the idea that an asteroid killed the dinosaurs. First proposed in 1980 by Luis and Walter Alvarez, the story of a giant rock striking Earth 65 million years ago has since been popularized in countless newspaper articles, televisions shows, and Hollywood blockbusters. Some of my colleagues will even tell you ground zero is the Chicxulub impact structure located off the coast of the Yucatan peninsula in Mexico. And most people seem happy to accept their word. Because I’m a scientist, people will ask me if there is life on Mars, if global warming is for real, or even if the moon landings were a hoax, but not once has someone asked me if I thought the dinosaurs were really toasted by a giant asteroid. After all, how else would you suddenly kill off an animal as cool as a T-Rex?

    Back in 1980, the principal piece of evidence suggesting an asteroid was to blame came from a little known element called iridium. When the Alvarez group analyzed sediments deposited right after the dinosaurs died 65 million years ago—a moment in geologic time known as the K/T boundary—they found concentrations of iridium, which is extremely rare on Earth but abundant in asteroids. At the time, no one had identified an impact crater that was 65 million years old, so scientists started looking. Eventually geologists found evidence for such a crater in drill samples taken while prospecting for oil in the Yucatan. To many the "smoking gun" had been found.

    Scientists are a skeptical bunch by nature, however, and while the press and Hollywood took the idea and ran with it, some of us began shaking our heads. One of the problems with the Chicxulub impact crater is that it’s about 100 miles in diameter. An important tenet of science is that a theory only has validity if it works all the time. Basically that means that other craters 100 miles in diameter or larger should also have wiped out most life on Earth. While few craters rival the size of Chicxulub, there are the 60-mile wide craters Manicouagan in Canada and Popigai in Russia. There is also the 150-mile wide Sudbury crater in Canada and the 180-mile wide Vredefort crater in South Africa. No mass extinctions have been associated with these impact structures, and Earth has experienced plenty of mass extinctions.

    A careful examination of drill samples by Gerta Keller of Princeton University and her colleagues also suggests that Chicxulub may have formed 300,000 years before the dinosaurs actually went extinct. And so far, only the K/T boundary appears to show an iridium "anomaly," suggesting that some other mechanism is responsible for other mass extinctions on Earth. While this evidence remains controversial, more and more scientists are giving up on Chicxulub as the smoking gun.

    So how important was the giant impact in killing off the dinosaurs? Despite all the hype, it may have had nothing to do with it.

    At the same time the dinosaurs were dying, an enormous volcanic eruption was occurring in what is now India. More than 12,000 cubic miles of lava poured out onto Earth’s surface within a very short period of time. The ash and gases associated with this eruption would have certainly affected climate in much the same way as a giant impact would.

    These so-called flood basalts have occurred throughout Earth’s history, and each time they’ve been associated with large mass extinctions. Vincent Courtillot, the scientist who first proposed this idea, says "there is more than a casual relation between flood basalts and mass extinctions." He suggests that hot material from deep within the Earth periodically rises and erupts almost catastrophically onto the surface. Such "super plumes" also seem to be associated with periodic changes in the Earth’s magnetic field. At the recent Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, Courtillot showed a relation between the larger cycles of magnetic reversals and mass extinctions. Many different pieces of his theory seem to fit together nicely.

    Of course, this explanation has some problems as well. At the same AGU Meeting, I had the opportunity to chat with geophysicist Paul Silver of the Carnegie Institution. Instead of "super plumes," Paul says that some scientists now refer jokingly to "smart plumes"(that always know when and where they're needed). It seems at least some flood basalts aren’t caused by plumes—they occur after tectonic plates have been stressed. In a recent model proposed by Silver, magma actually forms enormous puddles under the continents over time. The giant stresses and faulting that occur when crustal plates collide creates the pathways for this magma to reach the surface—usually over very short timescales. What I particularly like about Silver’s paper is that he provides ideas for testing his model, including seismic surveys that may show magma puddles forming under the continents.

    1 2

    Few scientific theories have been accepted as quickly as the idea that an asteroid killed the dinosaurs. First proposed in 1980 by Luis and Walter Alvarez, the story of a giant rock striking Earth 65 million years ago has since been popularized in countless newspaper articles, televisions shows, and Hollywood blockbusters. Some of my colleagues will even tell you ground zero is the Chicxulub impact structure located off the coast of the Yucatan peninsula in Mexico. And most people seem happy to accept their word. Because I’m a scientist, people will ask me if there is life on Mars, if global warming is for real, or even if the moon landings were a hoax, but not once has someone asked me if I thought the dinosaurs were really toasted by a giant asteroid. After all, how else would you suddenly kill off an animal as cool as a T-Rex?

    Back in 1980, the principal piece of evidence suggesting an asteroid was to blame came from a little known element called iridium. When the Alvarez group analyzed sediments deposited right after the dinosaurs died 65 million years ago—a moment in geologic time known as the K/T boundary—they found concentrations of iridium, which is extremely rare on Earth but abundant in asteroids. At the time, no one had identified an impact crater that was 65 million years old, so scientists started looking. Eventually geologists found evidence for such a crater in drill samples taken while prospecting for oil in the Yucatan. To many the "smoking gun" had been found.

    Scientists are a skeptical bunch by nature, however, and while the press and Hollywood took the idea and ran with it, some of us began shaking our heads. One of the problems with the Chicxulub impact crater is that it’s about 100 miles in diameter. An important tenet of science is that a theory only has validity if it works all the time. Basically that means that other craters 100 miles in diameter or larger should also have wiped out most life on Earth. While few craters rival the size of Chicxulub, there are the 60-mile wide craters Manicouagan in Canada and Popigai in Russia. There is also the 150-mile wide Sudbury crater in Canada and the 180-mile wide Vredefort crater in South Africa. No mass extinctions have been associated with these impact structures, and Earth has experienced plenty of mass extinctions.

    A careful examination of drill samples by Gerta Keller of Princeton University and her colleagues also suggests that Chicxulub may have formed 300,000 years before the dinosaurs actually went extinct. And so far, only the K/T boundary appears to show an iridium "anomaly," suggesting that some other mechanism is responsible for other mass extinctions on Earth. While this evidence remains controversial, more and more scientists are giving up on Chicxulub as the smoking gun.

    So how important was the giant impact in killing off the dinosaurs? Despite all the hype, it may have had nothing to do with it.

    At the same time the dinosaurs were dying, an enormous volcanic eruption was occurring in what is now India. More than 12,000 cubic miles of lava poured out onto Earth’s surface within a very short period of time. The ash and gases associated with this eruption would have certainly affected climate in much the same way as a giant impact would.

    These so-called flood basalts have occurred throughout Earth’s history, and each time they’ve been associated with large mass extinctions. Vincent Courtillot, the scientist who first proposed this idea, says "there is more than a casual relation between flood basalts and mass extinctions." He suggests that hot material from deep within the Earth periodically rises and erupts almost catastrophically onto the surface. Such "super plumes" also seem to be associated with periodic changes in the Earth’s magnetic field. At the recent Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, Courtillot showed a relation between the larger cycles of magnetic reversals and mass extinctions. Many different pieces of his theory seem to fit together nicely.

    Of course, this explanation has some problems as well. At the same AGU Meeting, I had the opportunity to chat with geophysicist Paul Silver of the Carnegie Institution. Instead of "super plumes," Paul says that some scientists now refer jokingly to "smart plumes"(that always know when and where they're needed). It seems at least some flood basalts aren’t caused by plumes—they occur after tectonic plates have been stressed. In a recent model proposed by Silver, magma actually forms enormous puddles under the continents over time. The giant stresses and faulting that occur when crustal plates collide creates the pathways for this magma to reach the surface—usually over very short timescales. What I particularly like about Silver’s paper is that he provides ideas for testing his model, including seismic surveys that may show magma puddles forming under the continents.

    There is still a lot of work to do. But the next time you see a picture of dinosaurs running from a giant asteroid falling from the sky, you might also want to think about the magma slowly collecting beneath your feet.

    Posted January 16, 2007.

    Bob Craddockis a geologist with the National Air and Space Museum's Center for Earth and Planetary Studies.


     
    Comments

    Makes one think a bit different.

    Posted by William J Ferwerda on October 16,2008 | 04:21PM

    What evidence is there that the flood basalts were not caused by the impact. Many moons and some planets show evidence of antipodal eruptions. How large would an object have to be to cause such an eruption on earth? Taking continental drift into account would the Deccan Traps have been just such an event? Perhaps a cosmic one-two punch.

    Posted by Chris Jouan on November 1,2008 | 05:18PM

    Could it be that the other impact craters of largest size, could coincide with other extinctions? What of those largest impacts, in combination (or not) with the "super-volcanic" eruptions, causing global problems. Or could the idea of the largest impactors - upon impact with the earth - CAUSED the super eruptions, even if you would need to give alittle "wiggle room" with the dates to be placed close enough for a continual global effect? (an impact triggers an eruption, which extends the global affects for the exctions to be possibles.

    Posted by john d krull on June 20,2009 | 12:56PM

    Could it be that the other impact craters of largest size, could coincide with other extinctions? What of those largest impacts, in combination (or not) with the "super-volcanic" eruptions, causing global problems. Or could the idea of the largest impactors - upon impact with the earth - CAUSED the super eruptions, even if you would need to give alittle "wiggle room" with the dates to be placed close enough for a continual global effect? (an impact triggers an eruption, which extends the global affects for the exctions to be possibles.

    Posted by john d krull on June 20,2009 | 12:56PM

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:



    Advertisement

    Air & Space Videos

    Wright B Over Manhattan, 1912

    In the winter of 1912, Frank Coffyn filmed the first silent motion pictures of New York ever taken from an airplane.

    A Space Suit Ahead of Its Time

    More flexible than the Apollo suit, the EX-1A never flew.

    Marines Test the Joint Strike Fighter

    A Marine takes the new F-35 for a spin.

    On the Prowl

    On the Prowl

    Climb into the cockpit for a flight in an EA-6B Prowler.

    The Human Price

    Apollo veteran Lynn Radcliffe recalls the constant stress and long hours.

    Mercury Astronauts Meet the Press, 1959

    ...and answer the question: "What was your least favorite test?"

    Advertisement

    Marketplace

    SmithsonianStore

    Night at the Museum Adult Collage Tee
    Item no: 28206

    Window Shopping

    Gifts, Gadgets and Great Finds!

    Travel & Adventure

    A Family Weekend in Washington, D.C.: Featuring "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian"

    Spend a fun-filled weekend with your family discovering the magic of the new feature film, "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" (Jul. 24 - 26, 2009)

    In the Magazine

    July 2009

    • Step Outside
    • Where the Wild Things Are
    • The Six
    • Travels with Churchill
    • Tumbling with the Stars
    • The Billy Mitchell Court-Martial
    • Fire Hazard

    View Table of Contents

    Snapshot

    Max Abort

    We hope it'll never be more than a test.

    Reader Scrapbook

    Send In Your Photos

    Check out our scrapbook of readers' aviation and space pictures. Then add your own.

    Need to Know

    What determines an airplane’s lifespan?

    Some keep flying for decades, while others end up on the scrap heap.

    Smithsonian Journeys

    Moorish Treasures of the Mediterranean

    Follow the ancient trade route and discover the civilizations that flourished in its wake



    View full archiveRecent Issues


    • Jul 2009


    • May 2009


    • Mar 2009

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Institution
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright
    • About Air & Space
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Reader Panel
    • Subscribe
    • RSS

    Smithsonian Institution

    Produced by Clickability